|
Post by ikt on Dec 12, 2011 19:15:49 GMT 1
Let's talk about this game.
|
|
|
Post by icelaglace on Dec 12, 2011 19:18:48 GMT 1
There are weapons inside and you can shoot people. Might be fun that people who has the game to post their Origin names here anyway.
|
|
|
Post by h1vltg3 on Dec 12, 2011 19:45:53 GMT 1
Guns go bang, I just bought it, shoot me please. I_H1_Vltg3_I
|
|
|
Post by icelaglace on Dec 12, 2011 19:49:32 GMT 1
I just like to C4 some tanks but sure, then the game will work again on this laptop
|
|
|
Post by dmcprince1 on Dec 13, 2011 14:56:45 GMT 1
I´d like to play some BF3 with the new patch. It´ll be definitely even more fun.
|
|
|
Post by spaceman1200 on Dec 14, 2011 22:13:02 GMT 1
Back to Karkand is pretty sweet
|
|
|
Post by icelaglace on Dec 14, 2011 22:41:22 GMT 1
Back to Karkand is pretty sweet Never tried yet, does it worth the buying?
|
|
|
Post by dmcprince1 on Dec 14, 2011 23:53:56 GMT 1
I played it like 2 hours today. I like it so far. 4 old/new maps, with 4 new vehicles and 10 new weapons. And for free (Limited edition)I think you'll have to pay 15 $ if you buyed the standart edition. But I think it's worth the price. And worth buying.
|
|
luxyuz
Modding Rookie
Posts: 5
|
Post by luxyuz on Dec 15, 2011 16:05:23 GMT 1
I think the game is badly optimized. I played on the beta stages and I didn't like the frames I was getting from my i5-2500K. Comparing it to MW3, this one runs smooth. But I prefer BF3 for the Frostbite and all that ilovepoop. Can't afford it right now =(
|
|
|
Post by spaceman1200 on Dec 15, 2011 20:51:34 GMT 1
Back to Karkand is pretty sweet Never tried yet, does it worth the buying? The maps are a little scaled back from BF2, But they did a decent job on redesigning them. There are 4 maps and 10 weapons added. The Karkand maps seem to load much faster then the retail maps for some odd reason. I think the game is badly optimized. I played on the beta stages and I didn't like the frames I was getting from my i5-2500K. Comparing it to MW3, this one runs smooth. But I prefer BF3 for the Frostbite and all that ilovepoop. Can't afford it right now =( The retail runs a helluva lot smoother then the beta.
|
|
booz
Modding Rookie
Posts: 4
|
Post by booz on Dec 16, 2011 23:28:45 GMT 1
Lux battlefield is very gpu dependent, it doesn't seem to care what you have as long as its more then a single core. There was a 1 fps difference between a quad core and dual core cpu. So it is more likely your gpu, or drivers for your card that's holding you back. If you have an amd card in there, from the benchies I've seen on toms, they seem to be having issues that nvidia don't seem to be having right now.
|
|
virux
Modding Rookie
Posts: 37
|
Post by virux on Jan 23, 2012 23:22:32 GMT 1
I think the game is badly optimized. I played on the beta stages and I didn't like the frames I was getting from my i5-2500K. Comparing it to MW3, this one runs smooth. But I prefer BF3 for the Frostbite and all that ilovepoop. Can't afford it right now =( Tzz MW3... this must be a joke, isn't it? This engine is 5 years old... ofc it has more fps than BF3 But u only need a better GPU not a CPU.
|
|
|
Post by verbalartistic on Mar 9, 2012 21:21:04 GMT 1
BF3 great game. love the sound fx.
|
|
|
Post by halomaster07 on Mar 10, 2012 5:14:16 GMT 1
Extreme month and a half bump! I thoroughly enjoyed BF3 for just about everything. Realism, details, destruction, sounds, gameplay, maps.. The list goes on and on. Terrific game.
|
|
luxyuz
Modding Rookie
Posts: 5
|
Post by luxyuz on Apr 13, 2012 19:27:29 GMT 1
My GPU is a GTX460SE. Its not top of the line but I like it for being fordable.
BF3 is an awesome game, if only they didn't shift there focused mid development from pc to consoles...
|
|